- The selection will take place with initial assessment from a panel of judges, followed by a presentation/demonstration by the student. UCSC will conduct the judging and share the shortlisted students/projects with FITIS.
- Overall winners will be announced by the Ministry of Education
- No of students recognized at final awards including:
NATIONAL WINNERS
EVALUATION STAGE 1 – INITIAL ASSESSMENT
Aim: Evaluation or investigation of software/hardware projects as part of a methodical survey, to assess suitability for the 2nd round.
Types of Projects:
- Software Based Projects:
- Hardware Based Projects: Using available resources (Video demonstration) or call for a demonstration parallel to the 2nd
Evaluators: Academic Experts (5 members in a panel)
MERIT WINNERS
EVALUATION STAGE 2 - PRESENTATION AND VIVA
Aim: Evaluation or investigation the individually and ownership of the submission
Evaluators: Academic & Industry Experts (5 or 7 members in a panel)
NOMINATION FOR APICTA AWARDS
FINAL JUDGMENT - INTERNAL
Aim: Evaluation Stage: Final Round – Internal
Overall discussion is made by the same panel selected amongst industry and academia. The panel needs to select the best out of the best project (Software/Hardware) and submit to the board where each panel needs to explain their best projects
